Well, this is what I think as well. These greeny environmentalists really should be killed off, because they are harming the environment. I know I am not, so on with it, Mr Rudd. Out with the firing squad. Oops, you want to send them to Indo wrapped in drugs to get them done over there, don't you.... still too close is it? Well Iraq is too far away for you, so how about China? They are keen to kill drug dealers, oops, they have the Olympics. Well what do you do when Labor is in power and you have radicals that talk like this----

Human-Hating Humanitarians

Some of the more radical elements of the environmental movement say some pretty weird things. Some of their proposals to make us all greener seem to be proposals to makes us all dead – or at least some of us dead. In their zeal to save the planet, they are often quite willing to view humans as expendable at best or a plague at worst. Indeed, some of them really don’t seem to like people at all.

Consider the case of one academic and his proposals as found in the Medical Journal of Australia. Associate Professor Barry Walters of the University of Western Australia told the journal that families should pay a $5000-plus baby levy at birth and an annual carbon tax of up to $800 a child. He also opined that every couple with more than two children should be taxed to pay for enough trees to offset the carbon emissions generated over each child’s lifetime.

Read it here.

And Andrew Bolt's article is here, which really hits the mark as well.